Skip to content
fEuzion

The operating standard

The T.A.P.E.S.™ system, in full.

Technical, Athletic, Psychological, Educational, Social. Five pillars, one written standard, the same protocols every time. This page sets the method out in full, because the method is what we are asking you to trust.

Mark · T.A.P.E.S.The T.A.P.E.S.™ mark, set on the platinum plate. Supply as a vector asset.

A whole-athlete assessment standard.

T.A.P.E.S.™ is a five-pillar framework for assessing and developing athletes that Dr Michael Bruce-de-Rouche has been building since 1992. It is written down: a manual, a set of test protocols, scoring rubrics, data-entry standards and report standards. Assessors are trained and approved against it before they deliver a diagnostic on their own.

Most football assessment measures what a player does with the ball, or what their body can do, and calls it a profile. T.A.P.E.S.™ covers both of those, and adds how the player thinks under pressure, how they learn, and how they behave in a squad. Those three are measured, evidenced and scored like the other two.

Principles

The rules the standard runs on.

  1. Athlete-centred

    Every assessment must produce a useful development pathway, not simply a score.

  2. Evidence-led

    Scores must be supported by observable evidence — timed results, video, coach notes or validated questionnaires. An assessor scores against a rubric, not a general impression.

  3. Repeatable

    Tests and observations are conducted the same way at every reassessment. A result you cannot repeat is not a measurement.

  4. Context-aware

    Age, maturity, playing position, training age, injury status and testing conditions are all considered before a number means anything.

  5. Development-focused

    Red and amber outcomes identify priorities for targeted support. They are not permanent labels.

  6. Transparent

    Staff must be able to explain the basis of every score and every recommendation, in plain terms, to the athlete and the parent.

  7. Confidential

    Athlete information is only viewed and used by authorised people, with appropriate consent.

The framework

The five pillars.

T — Technical

Measures sport-specific skill execution, game intelligence, and technical quality.

The Technical pillar evaluates football-specific execution, awareness, decision-making and control. Every domain is scored against a rubric and every score carries recorded evidence.

The domains, and the evidence recorded

First touch
Right-foot and left-foot control, receiving under pressure, directional first touch.Video, structured drill score, assessor notes.
Ball manipulation
Close control, turns, changes of direction, manipulation speed.Video and timed drill results.
Speed with ball
Straight-line and directional dribbling.Timed course, video analysis.
Small-space control
Control in confined areas, quick feet, composure.Small-sided task, coach grading.
Intelligence
Scanning, awareness, pattern recognition, anticipation.Video observation and a decision task.
Game understanding
Passing range, passing timing, positioning, game management.Passing drills, scenario tasks, match footage.
Decision-making
Quality of choice under time pressure.Video, coach observation, guided scenarios.

Band descriptors

Blue
Performs consistently at a high level under pressure; demonstrates speed, control, awareness and adaptability.
Green
Performs well, with only minor inconsistencies or development gaps.
Amber
Demonstrates basic competence but requires significant technical refinement or faster decision-making.
Red
Demonstrates major limitations in control, execution, awareness or application.
A band descriptor is a reading of one assessment. Red and amber mark where the work goes next.

A — Athletic

Measures speed, agility, power, strength, endurance, flexibility, mobility, and physical readiness.

The Athletic pillar is the most data-intensive part of T.A.P.E.S.™. It uses objective testing, repeat measures, comparison against appropriate benchmarks, and consistency analysis. Thirteen domains are covered.

The thirteen athletic domains

Speed
5m, 10m, 15m, 20m, 30m sprints.Seconds.
Acceleration
5m reaction, 10m drive phase.Seconds.
Top speed
20m, 30m, 60m sprint profile.Seconds.
Agility
5-0-5 right and left, directional agility, quick feet.Seconds.
Power
Counter-movement jump, squat jump, bounding.Centimetres, repetitions, contact metrics.
Reactive strength
Reactive strength index testing.RSI score.
Strength
Bodyweight strength, gym measures, core stability.Kilograms, repetitions, time.
Anaerobic capacity
Timed burst-run tests and circuit work.Time, repetitions, performance score.
Lactate tolerance
200m, 300m, 400m efforts.Seconds.
Aerobic capacity
500m, 650m, 800m, 1km, mile.Minutes and seconds.
Hill efforts
60m, 80m, 170m hill running.Seconds.
Flexibility
Joint and muscle-group range.Degrees, reach distance, graded range.
Mobility
Movement range, frequency, rhythm, movement quality.Observation and graded score.

Four in-house test names in the standard are described generically here rather than published under their internal names.To be confirmed

How the athletic tests are run

  • The same start position on every attempt, with the start type recorded: standing, rolling or reaction-based.
  • Adequate recovery between maximal sprints.
  • Every repetition is recorded, not only the best one. The best valid attempt is used for benchmark comparison; all valid attempts are used for consistency analysis.
  • Wind, surface, footwear, timing method and any false start are noted.
  • Agility is tested on both sides. Turning preference and any visible asymmetry are recorded, and a material difference between sides is flagged for review.
  • Jump testing standardises footwear and surface, demonstrates correct landing mechanics first, records every attempt, and monitors knee position, trunk control, balance and left–right symmetry. Testing stops if landing quality deteriorates or if there is pain.
  • Seconds for timed tests, centimetres for jump height, unless a protocol states otherwise. Whether timing was manual or electronic is always recorded.

Benchmarking

Results are compared against the appropriate reference: age group, sex where the benchmark data supports it, athletic development level, position, available percentile tables, the athlete’s own history, and maturity and anthropometric context.

A single result must never be used in isolation to determine long-term potential.

P — Psychological

Measures motivation, mindset, emotional control, cognitive processing, and behaviour under pressure.

The Psychological pillar assesses the behavioural and cognitive characteristics that influence how an athlete responds to training, competition and correction. In our football weighting model it carries more weight than any other pillar.

Domains and assessment focus

Motivation
Internalised motivation, externalised motivation, balanced motivation.
Attitude
Positive mindset, effort, stress management, pursuit of excellence, confidence and posture.
Emotional regulation
Ability to manage frustration, pressure, setbacks and feedback.
Rational processing
Ability to pause, reflect and make constructive choices.
Cognitive processing
Decision-making under pressure, memory, attention to detail, task completion, processing speed.

How it is assessed

Athlete self-report questionnaire; parent or guardian input for younger athletes; coach observation; structured decision-making tasks; video-based football scenarios; session-behaviour observation; and how the athlete responds to feedback during the session itself.

We do not diagnose.

No part of this pillar is a mental-health assessment and no member of staff will diagnose a condition through it. Where a wellbeing concern is identified, staff follow the safeguarding and referral process. To be confirmed

E — Educational

Measures learning, retention, and application of information.

The Educational pillar measures the athlete's ability to learn, retain and apply information. It is the pillar most often missing from a football assessment, and the one that usually explains why two players with identical physical scores develop at completely different rates.

Domains and what is observed

Learning rate
How quickly the athlete understands a new instruction or movement.
Learning style
Preferred methods such as visual, verbal, demonstration, repetition or guided practice.
Retention
Ability to remember previous instructions, concepts or movement patterns.
Application
Ability to use learning in a new drill, decision or competitive context.

How it is assessed

A new technical pattern is taught. The athlete is given several repetitions. The context is then changed, and the assessor observes whether the athlete can recall and apply the principle independently.

S — Social

Measures manners, respect, humility, communication, leadership, teamwork, and conduct.

The Social pillar measures the behaviours that affect a team environment, coachability and long-term development.

Domains and what is observed

Manners
Polite communication, punctuality, appropriate behaviour.
Respect
Treatment of staff, peers, facilities, equipment and opponents.
Humility
Willingness to learn, response to correction, absence of disruptive entitlement.
Communication
Clear, appropriate interaction with peers and staff.
Leadership
Positive influence, responsibility, encouragement, decision-making.
Teamwork
Cooperation, inclusion and support for others.
Conduct
Reliability, discipline and adherence to standards.

Social assessments record behaviour, not personality.

Observable behaviours with dates, context and examples. We do not label a child’s character, and we do not write anything in a report we would not say to that child’s face.

The session

Delivered over two sessions.

The standard diagnostic runs across two sessions or two assessment days.

  1. Day one: Technical and Athletic

    Profile verification, movement preparation, speed, agility, power and endurance testing, football technical tasks, and video capture.

  2. Day two: Psychological, Educational, Social and repeat measures

    Questionnaires, guided tasks, learning and retention tasks, behavioural observation, repeats of selected physical measures, and preparation of your feedback.

The assessor may adapt the order for age, weather, facility access, fatigue, safeguarding needs or sport-specific demands. Any change is recorded.

The standard warm-up
Light aerobic movement, dynamic mobility, movement preparation, sprint mechanics, low-level plyometrics, sport-specific ball work and progressive accelerations. The warm-up is age-appropriate and is recorded as completed.
Before any test is run
Identity and consent confirmed. Current health status checked. Questions on injury, soreness, illness, sleep and recent training. Any factor that could affect performance recorded. The session plan explained and every test demonstrated. And the athlete told, clearly, that they may stop at any time if they are uncomfortable.

Scoring

How the score is built.

Each metric is compared against the relevant benchmark and assigned a band. Bands are converted to an internal score, pillar scores are calculated, the approved football weighting is applied, and the result is expressed as a fEuzionScore™ from 0 to 100, where higher is stronger.

The weighting is not equal across the five pillars, and it is not fixed forever. It is refined by age, position and pathway as the evidence base grows. For football, the Psychological pillar currently carries the heaviest weight of the five. For younger athletes, assessors place greater emphasis on learning, movement quality, enjoyment and developmental trajectory than on current physical output.

The four bands

  • Blue

    76–100

    Performing at a high standard with consistency under pressure. Maintain strengths, work marginal gains, monitor workload.

  • Green

    51–75

    Performing well with specific gaps. Build consistency and close the named gaps.

  • Amber

    26–50

    Functional, with structured development required. A targeted programme with measurable objectives.

  • Red

    0–25

    Significant gaps to address before progression. Fundamentals first — movement, technique, behaviour or readiness — and a review of the support around the athlete.

A band is the state of one assessment on one day, recorded under known conditions. That is why we put a retest date in the diary at the same time as we give you the band.

The twelve steps from a raw result to a plan

  1. Record the athlete's raw results.
  2. Validate the result and the testing conditions.
  3. Compare the result with the relevant benchmark.
  4. Assign a band to the metric.
  5. Convert the band to the internal score.
  6. Calculate the pillar scores.
  7. Apply the approved pathway and sport-specific weighting.
  8. Generate the overall fEuzionScore™.
  9. Calculate consistency indicators.
  10. Produce the pathway outcome.
  11. Create the development recommendations.
  12. Schedule the reassessment.

Outcomes

How an outcome is expressed.

R.A.G.b™: for players already at a club or academy

R.A.G.b™ is the readiness classification: Red, Amber, Green and blue, where blue sits above green as the strongest band. It is used for players already attached to an academy, club, school or elite programme, alongside a pillar analysis, a consistency profile and a repair plan. It exists to tell a coach where to spend the next twelve weeks. Red and amber mark where that work should go.

S.T.A.R.: for unsigned players

S.T.A.R. is the pre-academy diagnostic outcome for players not currently signed:

Sign
An exceptional current profile and high readiness for an appropriate opportunity. We produce a report, a pathway recommendation and a targeted progression plan.
Trial
Strong potential and clear readiness for trial exposure. We recommend a trial preparation programme and an appropriate club pathway.
Assess / Develop
Development potential is present, and key areas need improvement before trial readiness. A structured development programme and a retest date.
Review
The current profile does not meet the threshold for the pathway that was assessed. We give constructive feedback, guidance on the right level of participation for now, and an optional re-entry review plan.

None of these is a prediction. All four are decision-support: a recommendation about what to do next, made on evidence recorded on a given day, with a date to look again.

What we will never do.

We do not offer, imply or estimate a probability of signing, an academy place, a professional contract, a future transfer value or an injury outcome. Our own operating standard forbids it, and it would be a poor thing to sell to the parent of a child.

Consistency

dVr: the gap between best and usual.

A player who can do something brilliant once is not the same as a player who can do it reliably. dVr is the measure of that difference.

dVr compares an athlete’s current or average performance against their own best recorded performance. It is a gap, not a rank. A small dVr means a repeatable athlete. A rising dVr can mean fatigue, poor recovery, inconsistent technique, reduced readiness or unsuitable testing conditions. It is a reason to look before increasing training demand rather than after.

This is why we record every repetition rather than only the best one. The best attempt tells you the ceiling. Every attempt tells you the floor, and the floor is what a player performs on a wet Sunday.

What a dVr pattern indicates, and what we do about it
PatternWhat it indicatesWhat we do
Low and stableConsistent performanceContinue the current progression plan
Improving over timeBetter repeatability and readinessProgress the training appropriately
Moderate variationNormal variation, or emerging fatigueReview recovery, warm-up, workload and technique
Large or rising variationPossible fatigue, inconsistency, asymmetry or a performance concernInvestigate before increasing training demand

The cycle

A date to be measured again.

Every athlete leaves with a retest date. Repeat testing uses the same protocol wherever possible, because that is the only way a trend or a consistency reading means anything.

Suggested review frequency by situation
SituationSuggested review frequency
Pre-academy athlete in an active development programmeEvery 6–12 weeks
Signed academy athleteEvery 4–8 weeks for priority metrics; full diagnostic quarterly or by programme cycle
Returning from injuryAs directed by the appropriate medical and performance staff
New athleteBaseline assessment, then a targeted retest after the first development block
Mature athlete in a performance phaseAligned to the competition calendar and training plan

Quality assurance

The standard only means something if it’s applied the same way twice.

T.A.P.E.S.™ is a written standard, and a written standard is only as good as the people applying it. This is how we hold it steady.

Assessors are approved before they work alone

Every assessor must demonstrate understanding of the framework, the ability to deliver the protocols consistently, competence in safe warm-up and movement observation, knowledge of safeguarding procedures, and the ability to explain a result properly to a parent and an athlete. All assessors are trained and approved before they independently deliver diagnostics.

Calibration and inter-rater checks

Assessors are periodically re-calibrated against the standard. Testing procedures are reviewed on video, and scoring for the technical, psychological, educational and social pillars is checked between assessors so that a score means the same thing regardless of who gave it.

Data discipline

A timed result is never estimated. An unverified value is never entered as confirmed. Missing data is recorded as missing, not as zero. Corrections go through an audit process rather than overwriting the original. Units stay consistent across every visit.

Review

Unusual scores and incomplete data are reviewed rather than published. Data completeness is audited. Families and athletes are asked for feedback. The protocols themselves are reviewed annually.

We do not publish research citations, because the standard does not rest on a published study. It rests on established test protocols, applied the same way every time, by assessors who are checked against each other, with the evidence written down. If that is not enough for you, it is a fair objection, and we would rather you asked us about it than took our word for it.

Book a diagnostic